Disposed

Sudha Ramasamy & Anr. v. the State of N.C.T of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC4 Feb 2026CRL.M.C./5953/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners withdrew their petition before the Delhi High Court without prejudice, reserving their points for the Trial Court. The Court disposed of the petition as not pressed and granted both petitioners exemption from personal appearance through counsel, subject to filing an application with affidavits and appearing when required.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as not pressed; exemption from personal appearance granted subject to affidavit application within four weeks.

Sudha Ramasamy & Anr. Vs the State of N.C.T of Delhi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~60

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 5953/2023 &CRL.M.A. 22346/2023 SUDHA RAMASAMY & ANR.

¶4

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Apoorva Singhal with Mr. R Venkataraman and Mr. Tanuj Agarwal, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI & ORS.

¶7

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State SI Urvashi. Mr. Amandeep Singh with Mr. Pawan Kant Singh and Ms. Jagriti Singh, Advocates for R-2.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R

¶9

% 04.02.2026 1. After hearing arguments at some length, learned counsel for petitioners, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present petition. He submits that he would raise the points agitated in the present petition before the learned Trial Court, at appropriate stage.

¶10

He, however, submits that since both the petitioners herein, who are on bail, are settled in a village situated in Tamil Nadu, they may be granted exemption from personal appearance, through their counsel.

¶11

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 i.e. complainant, has no objection in this regard.

¶12

In view of the above, present petition is disposed of as not pressed.

¶13

All rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be adjudicated by the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage.

¶14

CRL.M.C. 5953/2023

¶15

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:26:08

¶18

Both the petitioners are granted exemption from personal appearance, and would be permitted to represent themselves through their counsel. However, an application to that effect along with their affidavits be laid in this regard before the learned Trial Court, within four weeks from today.

¶19

Indubitably, as and when, learned Trial Court feels their presence imperative, they would appear physically.

¶20

Needless to emphasize, the interim order stands vacated.

¶21

A copy of this order be sent to learned Trial Court for information.

¶22

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶23

FEBRUARY 4, 2026/ sw/sa

¶24

CRL.M.C. 5953/2023

¶25

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:26:08

Sudha Ramasamy & Anr. v. the State of N.C.T of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudha Ramasamy & Anr. v. the State of N.C.T of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satender Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Rohit Dhingra & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Aryan Bagga Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Jaskaran Singh Arora & Ors. Vs State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Sanjay Jain through the Pairokar Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Jaan Mohammad Vs the State NCT of Delhi