Petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The complainant was absent and the petitioner's request to issue notice for possible settlement was declined; the court held quashment must be voluntary, disposed of the petition, with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~94
VIPUL GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Counsel ( appearance not given )
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP. SI Vivek PS Neb sarai.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 23.07.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 23, 2026/ aks
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 11:34:44
Vipul Gupta
State of NCT of Delhi
Respondent No. 2 (complainant)
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
