Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 606/2025, PS Mehrauli under Sections 74/76/79/3(5) BNS on grounds of compromise with the complainant. The State opposed citing the seriousness of allegations and the complainant's Section 164 CrPC statement. Counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~85
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.K. Jha, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC with Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate for State and SI Vandana, PS Mehrauli. Mr. B.S. Jakhar, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 09.02.2026
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2026 at 13:15:51
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2026/ ry
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2026 at 13:15:51
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shiv Kumar Sharma & Ors.
The State of NCT of Delhi
Respondent No. 2 (complainant de facto)
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
