Dismissed¶17

Manish Srivastava v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC6 Jul 2026CRL.M.C./4586/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; CRL.M.C. 4586/2026; Manish Srivastava v. State of NCT of Delhi; Section 528 BNSS 2023 / Section 482 CrPC quashing; FIR No. 92/2020 PS EoW Delhi; supplementary chargesheet 03.09.2025/04.09.2025; summoning order 11.11.2025 CJM Patiala House Courts; Criminal Case No. 1975/2023; petition dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice; right to seek discharge reserved; no opinion on merits; Prateek Jalan, J.; decided 06.07.2026.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the petitioner's rights and contentions before the Trial Court at the stage of arguments on charge, including the right to seek discharge in accordance with law. ¶17

Manish Srivastava Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether the supplementary final report/chargesheet dated 03.09.2025/04.09.2025, the summoning order dated 11.11.2025 and all consequential proceedings (including Criminal Case No. 1975/2023) arising from FIR No. 92/2020 ought to be quashed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 — the issue left undetermined as the petition was withdrawn.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

After some arguments, counsel for the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the petition without prejudice to the petitioner’s rights and contentions before the Trial Court at the stage of arguments on charge, including the right to seek discharge in accordance with law.

¶16

Key takeaways

The petition, along with the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above submission.ratio¶17
The Court expressly did not express any opinion on the merits of the case or on any petition the petitioner may file hereafter; any such petition shall be considered and decided by the appropriate Court on its own merits and in accordance with law.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Quashing petition (CRL.M.C. 4586/2026) under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 CrPC, 1973) against the supplementary final report/chargesheet dated 03.09.2025/04.09.2025 filed pursuant to FIR No. 92/2020 (PS Economic Offences Wing, Delhi), the summoning order dated 11.11.2025 of the CJM, Patiala House Courts, and consequential proceedings including Criminal Case No. 1975/2023 — permitted to be withdrawn by counsel without prejudice to the petitioner's rights before the Trial Court at the arguments-on-charge stage, including the right to seek discharge; petition dismissed as withdrawn; Court expressed no opinion on merits. (Prateek Jalan, J.; 06.07.2026)

¶1

$~92

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 4586/2026 & CRL.M.A. 19086-87/2026

¶4

MANISH SRIVASTAVA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shwetank Sailakwal, Mr. Mayank S., Mr. Alok Mishra, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP. SI Mohit Parkash, PS-EoW. Mr. Madhav Khurana, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhinav Sekhri, Ms. Shaurya Singh, Advocates for complainant.

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 06.07.2026

¶10

By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), the petitioner seeks quashing of the supplementary final report/chargesheet dated 03.09.2025/04.09.2025 filed pursuant to FIR No. 92/2020 dated 07.08.2020, registered at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, Delhi, the summoning order dated 11.11.2025 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, including Criminal Case No. 1975/2023, which is presently pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patiala House

¶11

CRL.M.C. 4586/2026

¶12

Page 1 of 2

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/07/2026 at 11:48:18

¶15

Courts, New Delhi.

¶16

After some arguments, Mr. Shwetank Sailakwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, without prejudice to the petitioner’s rights and contentions before the Trial Court at the stage of arguments on charge, including the right to seek discharge in accordance with law.

¶17

The petition, alongwith pending applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, in terms of the above submission.

¶18

It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case or on any petition that may be filed by the petitioner hereafter, which shall be considered and decided by the appropriate Court on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶19

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶20

JULY 6, 2026 ‘ B ’/SD/

¶21

CRL.M.C. 4586/2026

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/07/2026 at 11:48:18

Manish Srivastava v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Srivastava v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Tiwari and Anr. Vs State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.

Sh Navdeep Singh Vs Smt Banpreet Kaur Bhatia & Anr.

Shri Vikas and Ors. Vs the State NCT Delhi and Ors.

Aurangjeb Miyan Vs State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)

Whitespan Living Private Limited Company Vs Prateek Kumar Chowdhary

Arvind Kumar Dabra & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.