Petitioners sought a writ to defreeze their bank accounts. Respondents proposed a date for petitioner no.2 to join an investigation. Counsel for petitioner no.2 consented. The court dismissed the petition on withdrawal.
Dismissal of petition along with withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhishek Banerjee and Mr. Anand, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State with Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates and SI Parvesh Kumar, PS-Cyber Cell, Crime Branch.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 25.02.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 13:38:14
necessary documents shall be served/ supplied to the petitioners within a period of two days .
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
FEBRUARY 25, 2026/NA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 13:38:14
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mayurikabahen Jagdishkumar Patel and Ors
The State of NCT of Delhi
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
