Two petitions filed by the petitioner were taken up on mentioning; counsel sought unconditional withdrawal and the High Court dismissed both petitions along with accompanying applications as withdrawn. No substantive adjudication occurred.
Both petitions and accompanying applications dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19 & 20
Through: Mr. Rajiv R. Mishra, Advocate
versus
DR. SURAJ MUNJAL & ORS. .....Respondent
CHANDAN MUNJAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajiv R. Mishra, Advocate
versus
DR. SURAJ MUNJAL & ORS. .....Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
JULY 21, 2026/as
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2026 at 12:03:31
Chandan Munjal
Dr. Suraj Munjal & Ors.
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
