Petitioners sought withdrawal of a writ petition arising from matrimonial proceedings, wishing to explore settlement with respondent No. 2. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to seek remedies before the Sessions Court and this Court, and directed counsel to urge settlement before the Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~90
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC. SI Ridhima, ASI Ravinder, PS-Model Towarn and B.L. Dairy. Mr. Yuganshu Sharma, Mr. Sarthak Vashisht, Advocates for complainant.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 04.02.2026
W.P.(CRL) 397/2026
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 13:28:00
submits that he will need to take instructions on this aspect. Learned counsel on both sides may make necessary submissions before the Sessions Court on the next date of hearing, on the possibility of settlement.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 4, 2026 ‘ Bhupi ’/AD/
W.P.(CRL) 397/2026
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 13:28:00
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to pursue remedies before the Sessions Court and explore settlement.
SANJEEV KAPOOR AND ORS.
STATE NCT OF DELHI
B.L. DAIRY
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
