Babu Yamin v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against conviction under Section 10 PoCSO Act for sexual assault on a three-year-old child. The court found the victim's testimony clear and trustworthy, upheld reliance on sole victim testimony without corroboration, and dismissed the appeal.
What the court decided
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- % Judgment Reserved on: 02.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on:05 .02.2026
- CRL.A. 397/2017
BABU YAMIN .....Appellant
Through: Ms. Monika Tripathy, Mr. Saksham Singh and Mr. Gautam Yadav, Advocates.
versus
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gahalot, APP for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
JUDGMENT
CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.
- In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, (the CrPC) the sole accused in SC No. 153 of 2013 on the file of the Special Court under the
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the conviction under Section 10 PoCSO Act based on the testimony of the 3-year-old victim suffers from any infirmity warranting interference.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Babu Yamin
- respondent
State
Coram
Chandrasekharan Sudha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court