Dismissed¶16

Sudhir Bajaj v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Delhi HC29 Apr 2026CRL.M.C./3308/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sudhir Bajaj v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors., CRL.M.C. 3308/2026, Delhi High Court, Prateek Jalan, J., 29.04.2026. Section 528 BNSS 2023 petition; challenge to Sessions Court order dated 21.04.2026 dismissing revision against Magistrate's Court FIR-registration direction dated 28.07.2023; P.S. Vivek Vihar; R4/PNB; dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice; liberty reserved to seek transfer of proceedings arising out of subject FIR; no merits comment on future transfer petition; pending applications CRL.M.As. 13427-13429/2026 also disposed.

What did the court decide?

None substantive; petition dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to rights in pending criminal proceedings, with liberty reserved to seek transfer of proceedings arising out of the subject FIR. ¶16

Sudhir Bajaj Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~113

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 3308/2026, CRL.M.As. 13427-13429/2026

¶4

SUDHIR BAJAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastav, APP for State with SI Sumeet Punia, P.S. Vivek Vihar. Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, Advocates for R4/PNB.

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 29.04.2026

¶12

By way of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 21.04.2026, whereby the Sessions Court dismissed his revision petition against the order dated 28.07.2023 passed by the Magistrate’s Court, directing the concerned Station House Officer to register an FIR.

¶13

After some arguments, Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner in the pending criminal proceedings. Mr. Sabharwal also seeks to reserve the right of the petitioner to seek transfer of the proceedings arising out of the subject FIR, if so advised.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 11:51:26

¶16

Accordingly, the petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above submissions.

¶17

It is made clear that this Court has not made any comment on the merits of any transfer petition that may be filed, and the rights and contentions of the parties remain reserved.

¶18

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶19

APRIL 29, 2026 ‘sv/KA’/

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 11:51:26

Sudhir Bajaj v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Bajaj v. the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Joneja Vs State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Others

Yashika Khurana Vs Rishabh Khurana

Javed@ Jabir@ Raja Vs State (Nct Delhi)

Bir Singh Rathore Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Sunil Singh Chauhan Vs State NCT of Delhi

Karan Vs State Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr.