Disposed
Anil Kumar v. CBI
Delhi HCCRL.A./320/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Two criminal appeals were abated after the High Court verified the deaths of both appellants; counsel confirmed the legal heirs did not wish to pursue either appeal further.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~4 & 5
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.A. 320/2014 ANIL KUMAR .....Appellant Through: None. versus CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPP, CBI with Mr. Changez Khan, Adv. 5 + CRL.A. 334/2014 SURINDER KUMAR BEHL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Dilip Pandita, Adv. versus STATE THROUGH CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPP, CBI with Mr. Changez Khan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV
¶4
- O R D E R
¶5
- % 10.04.2026
¶6
CRL.A. 320/2014
¶7
- Hybrid Mode.
¶8
- None for the Appellant.
¶9
- The death of the Appellant has been verified and reported by the CBI.
¶10
- In view of the death of the Appellant, the appeal stands abated inasmuch as his legal heirs do not seemingly want to continue with the proceedings.
¶11
This is a digitally signed order.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Anil Kumar
- respondent
CBI
- appellant
Surinder Kumar Behl
- respondent
State through CBI
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court