Petitioner sought fair investigation; the State reported that investigation found no offence and a cancellation report was filed. Holding nothing survived, the court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
SHALU .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Kanhaiya Singhal, Mr Prasanna, Mr Ajay, Ms. Avantika Shankar, Mr Yash Arora, Advs.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi ASC (Crl) with Mr. Sangeet Sibou Advs.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 06.07.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 6, 2026/P
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:54:53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition seeking fair investigation survives when the State files a cancellation report after investigation.
Shalu
State (NCT of Delhi)
Anr.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
