Dismissed
Lalit Kumar v. Shalini Mishra
Delhi HCCRL.M.C./2549/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners failed to appear on multiple dates and did not comply with directions. Both petitions and accompanying applications were dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
None; both petitions dismissed in default.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~20 & 21
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2548/2019 & CRL.M.A. 10163/2019 PRAVEEN GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: None. versus SHALINI MISHRA .....Respondent Through: None. + CRL.M.C. 2549/2019 & CRL.M.A. 10166/2019 LALIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: None. versus SHALINI MISHRA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 17.07.2026 1. For past many dates none has been appearing on behalf of petitioners and even steps as directed are not being taken. Today also till this time (03:45pm) none has appeared.
¶3
- Both petitions and accompanying applications are dismissed in default.
¶4
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
¶5
JULY 17, 2026/ ry
¶6
This is a digitally signed order.
¶7
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2026 at 11:26:55
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Praveen Gupta
- respondent
Shalini Mishra
- petitioner
Lalit Kumar
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court