Husband's petition to quash a matrimonial FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, 34 IPC after settlement and divorce by mutual consent; complainant raised no objection, and the court quashed the FIR and consequential proceedings under Section 528 BNSS.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishna Parashar and Mr. Navneet, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT & ANR.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Vinay Kumar. Mr. Ninad Dogra and Mr. Rachit Gumber, Advocates for R-2 along with respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 223/2026 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 4.01.2026 11:06:25
terms, she is left with no grievance in the present matter and would have no objection if the instant FIR is quashed.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
JANUARY 12, 2026/ss/sa
Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 223/2026 2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 4.01.2026 11:06:25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 497/2024 under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC could be quashed on the basis of a settlement and divorce by mutual consent between the parties.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Naveen Kumar Agarwal & Ors.
The State of NCT
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
