Fakeer Chand & Ors. Vs State

$~6 to 8

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+	CRL.A. 189/2	007
	FAKEER CHA	ND & ORS.	.....Appellants
		Through: versus	Mr. Siddhant Saraswat, Adv.
	STATE	Through:	.....Respondent Ms.Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Vishant and SI Vinay PS New Ashok Nagar.
			Ms.Juhi Arora, Advocate for the complainant.
7
+	CRL.REV.P. 4	81/2007
	MEENU		.....Petitioner
		Through: versus	Revisionist in person with Ms.Juhi Arora, Advocate. Ms.Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State with SI Vishant and SI Vinay PS New Ashok Nagar.
	FAKEER CHA	ND & ORS. Through:	.....Respondents Mr. Siddhant Saraswat, Adv.
8
+	CRL.REV.P. 4	31/2014
	SURENDER	MAGGO & AN	R .....Petitioners
		Through: versus	Mr. Siddhant Saraswat, Adv.
	STATE	Through:	.....Respondent Ms.Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State
			with SI Deepak Sharma PS Tilak

¶4

This is a digitally signed order.

¶5

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/01/2026 at 12:42:50

¶6

Nagar.

¶7

Ms.Juhi Arora, Advocate for the complainant.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

¶9

O R D E R % 14.01.2026

¶10

In terms of the mediation settlement dated 10.03.2025, the parties have finally reached to the final step ie. payment of the last instalment by the appellant to the tune of Rs.5 lakhs. In compliance thereof, a Demand Draft bearing number 191927 drawn on Punjab National Bank Paharganj New Delhi dated 12.01.2026 in the name of complainant Meenu, has been handed over to her, copy of which is placed on record, which discharges the Appellants from all their responsibilities under the Mediation Settlement. 2. Learned Counsel for revisionist/respondent Meenu ( in Crl.Rev.481/2007 ) submits that a sum of Rs.50,000/- in the form of an FDR in the name of revisionist Meenu was deposited with the Registry, which too is required to be given to her alongwith the interest accrued thereupon. The revisionist also says that she is not interested in pressing the present revision petition no.481/2007. The same stands dismissed as “ withdrawn ” in terms of the abovereferred mediation settlement.

¶11

It is submitted by complainant Meenu that she does not have any objection, if the revision petition bearing Crl.Rev.Petition No.431/14 filed by revisionist Surender Maggo as well as the appeal filed on behalf of Fakeer Chand & Ors. bearing Crl.Appeal No.189/2007 , are allowed and judgment & sentence is set aside, to which even the State has no objection,

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/01/2026 at 12:42:50

¶14

given the fact that the matter has been amicably resolved through Mediation settlement.

¶15

So far as the remaining formalities are concerned ie. Divorce by mutual consent, has already been granted vide order dated 19.09.2025, as submitted by the parties.

¶16

The appellant(s) in Crl.A.No.189/2007 have “No objection” to the withdrawal of the money deposited with the Registry as has been claimed by the respondent/complainant Meenu along with the interest accrued thereupon.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid developments, the appeal bearing no. Crl.A.No.189/2007 (filed by Fakeer Chand and Ors.) and revision petition bearing no. Crl.Rev.Petition No.431/14 (filed by Surender Maggo & Ors) stand allowed, in view of the “No Objection” given by the State and the complainant emanating out of the mediation settlement .

¶18

The mediation settlement as such, stands complied with fully, as a result, the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 13.02.2007 and 26.02.2007 respectively stand set aside.

¶19

Both the appeal Crl.A.No.189/2007 and Revision Petition bearing number Crl.Rev.Petition(s) No.431/14 and 481/2007 , stand disposed off accordingly.

¶20

Copy of this order be placed in all the connected matters.

¶21

VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J

¶22

JANUARY 14, 2026/ bj

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/01/2026 at 12:42:50

Fakeer Chand & Ors. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fakeer Chand & Ors. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Vs CBI

Vidhi Chuhan Vs State through CBI

Jaipal Chauhan Vs State

Surender Maggo & Anr. Vs State

Jugal Kishore & Ors. Vs State

Sursh Chand @ Pappu Vs State