Petitioners sought quashing of a 2014 robbery-related FIR after entering into an MoU with the complainant, supported by affidavits. The court relied on Supreme Court precedent on quashing based on settlements and quashed the FIR and all proceedings emanating from it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
YOGESH SHARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person.
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Upasana Bakshi, Advocate and SI Sachin Sharma, PS-Lakshmi Nagar. Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 13.03.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2026 at 11:05:01
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2026 at 11:05:01
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
MARCH 13, 2026/NA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/03/2026 at 11:05:01
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No.17/2014 under Sections 392/411/34 IPC should be quashed following a voluntary MoU and settlement between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.Relied on¶5
(2013) 4 SCC 58 · Who else cites this
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Relied on¶5
(2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Relied on¶5
(2014) 6 SCC 466 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Yogesh Sharma & Anr.
State of NCT of Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
