Petitioners in a writ petition sought permission to withdraw the petition; the court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~68
MD. SAMAR SAIFI AND ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ashish Tyagi, Advocate (Thr. VC).
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State. Mr. Zeeshan Anjum, Advocate for victim.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 17.07.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 17, 2026 aks
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2026 at 11:49:40
Md. Samar Saifi and Ors.
State NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
