writing by the expert for comparison with the questioned document. Perusal of report Ex. PW16/A, proved by N.K. Aggarwal, project that questioned writings and admitted writings agree in their general writing characteristics such as movement, skill, alignment, slant, relative size, proportion of letters, spacing, position, abbreviation etc. In the report is it also mentioned that questioned and admitted writing also agree in their individual writing characteristics in execution of Hindi letters “Ka”, “Aa”, “Ba”, “Jha”, “La”, “Na”, “He”, “Da”, “Sa”, “Ta”, “Ra”, “Ma”, “Tha”, “Ja”, “Va”, “a”, “Chha” and “Cha” with the formation of its vertical staff, execution of its right body curve, right body continuation to the left body, lower body curve, nature of junction formation, hooked starts etc. in the questioned writing is similarly observed in the admitted writings. Manner of execution of figures “6”, “9”, “8” with the nature of curvature of its upper body and oval formation at the base, with the nature of start and lower body oval formation in anti-clock wise and formation of upper-body curve in clock wise direction with direction of finish as observed in the questioned writings is similarly observed in admitted writings. He found that no fundamental differences, but noted natural variations. Out of report Ex. PW16/A, it stands crystallized that contents of Ex. PW8/B were written by none else than the deceased, namely, Jyoti Taneja.
