Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR for offences punishable under Sections 323/506/509 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute, on the basis of a settlement between the parties after divorce. The court exercised its inherent powers to quash the FIR and all consequential proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~68
RAJENDER KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Manjeet Kapil, Advocate along with petitioners-in-person
versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for State Respondent No. 2 in person SI Sunil Chander, PS Ambedkar Nagar
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
J U D G M E N T (oral)
Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 1247/2026
1
Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 7.02.2026 14:10:49
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
FEBRUARY 13, 2026 /dr/pb
Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 1247/2026
2
Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 7.02.2026 14:10:49
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 0070/2018 under Sections 323/506/509 IPC should be quashed on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajender Kumar and ors
The State NCT of Delhi
Respondent no. 2
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
