Dismissed¶18

Syeda Fatima Taruj v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC18 Feb 2026CRL.M.C./1225/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; CRL.M.C. 1225/2026, CRL.M.C. 1238/2026, CRL.M.C. 1239/2026; petitioners Syeda Fatima Taruj, Ambika Burman, Syed Taruj Ahmed; respondent State (NCT of Delhi); bench Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma; petitions dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to approach Trial Court; pending applications CRL.M.A. 4948/2026, 4949/2026, 5017/2026, 5018/2026, 5019/2026, 5020/2026; decision date 18.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request, with liberty as prayed for to approach the learned Trial Court. ¶18

Syeda Fatima Taruj Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~45 to 47

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 1225/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4948-49/2026 SYEDA FATIMA TARUJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asad Hussain, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Deepak Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr. Surbhit Nandan, Ms. Nandika Vyas and Mr. Ayush Vardhan, Advocates for complainant

¶4

(46)

¶5

CRL.M.C. 1238/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5017-18/2026 AMBIKA BURMAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asad Hussain, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr. Surbhit Nandan, Ms. Nandika Vyas and Mr. Ayush Vardhan, Advocates for complainant

¶6

(47)

¶7

CRL.M.C. 1239/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5019-20/2026 SYED TARUJ AHMED

¶8

.....Petitioner

¶9

This is a digitally signed order.

¶10

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2026 at 11:24:11

¶11

Through: Mr. Asad Hussain, Advocate

¶12

versus

¶13

STATE NCT OF DELHI

¶14

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr. Surbhit Nandan, Ms. Nandika Vyas and Mr. Ayush Vardhan, Advocates for complainant

¶15

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

¶16

O R D E R % 18.02.2026

¶17

The leaned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court.

¶18

Accordingly, the present petitions alongwith pending applications i.e. CRL.M.A. 4948/2026, CRL.M.A. 5017/2026, CRL.M.A. 5019/2026, CRL.M.A. 4949/2026, CRL.M.A. 5018/2026 and CRL.M.A. 5020/2026 stand dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

¶19

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

¶20

DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 18, 2026/ns/ R

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2026 at 11:24:11

Syeda Fatima Taruj v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syeda Fatima Taruj v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Junaid Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sairaj Ahmad & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Rahul @ Puneet Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Deepak Gupta and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Rajat Nakra and Ors. Vs the State (Gnct), Delhi and Anr.