Suraj Mukherjee & Ors. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

¶1

$~79

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 1192/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4759/2026

¶4

SURAJ MUKHERJEE & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shubham Asri, Mr. Abhijeet Rai, Mr. Atul Rathi, Mr. Hardik Aggarwal and Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State.

¶7

SI Dinesh Kumar, P.S.: Nand Nagri. Ms. Vibha Walia and Ms. Tanuja Gupta, Advocates for R-2.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 12.02.2026

¶10

By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (‘BNSS’), the petitioners, who are the former husband and in-laws of the complainant/respondent No. 2, seek quashing of case FIR No. 554/2022 dated 09.07.2022 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 at P.S.: Nand Nagri, Delhi.

¶11

The petition is premised on Mediated Settlement dated 11.07.2023 arrived at through mediation before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi; and Divorce Decree dated 16.01.2024, which is the culmination of petitions under sections 13B(1) and

¶12

CRL.M.C. 1192/2026

¶13

Page 1 of 3

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:11:15

¶16

13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, whereby the parties had sought dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent.

¶17

The petition is supported by affidavits of the petitioners, as also of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs.

¶18

The petitioners as well as respondent No. 2 are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel.

¶19

The parties have confirmed that no child was born from the wed-lock.

¶20

No appeal is stated to have been filed from the divorce decree.

¶21

The court has queried respondent No. 2, who confirms that she has taken divorce by mutual consent; and that a mediated settlement deed has been entered into between the parties; and that in full-and-final settlement of all her claims including towards maintenance (past, present and future), stridhan , dowry articles, jewellery, permanent alimony, etc., she was to receive a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- from petitioner No. 1; out of which Rs. 4,00,000/- lacs was paid earlier and Rs. 1,00,000/- has been paid in court today, in compliance of the terms of the settlement deed. Respondent No. 2 confirms that all aspects of the settlement have now been performed.

¶22

Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.

¶23

In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh &Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be

¶24

CRL.M.C. 1192/2026

¶25

Page 2 of 3

¶26

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:11:15

¶27

quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties.

¶28

Accordingly, case FIR No. 554/2022 dated 09.07.2022 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 at P.S.: Nand Nagri, Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed.

¶29

Petition stands disposed-of.

¶30

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.

¶31

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶32

FEBRUARY 12, 2026 V.Rawat

¶33

CRL.M.C. 1192/2026

¶34

Page 3 of 3

¶35

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:11:15

Suraj Mukherjee & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Mukherjee & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanti Swaroop Alias Raj Chaudhary Vs State of NCT & Anr.

Aditya Kumar Singh Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mayank Dang & Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Pritam Singh Vs the State(Govt. of NCT Delhi) through SHO & Anr.

Sujal Singh Vs State NCT of Delhi through S.H.O. P.S. Dwarka South

Ashwani Kapoor Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.