Disposed¶20

Sandeep Yadav v. the State of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC11 Feb 2026CRL.M.C./1175/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of FIR; FIR No.24/2026; P.S. Shahbad Dairy; Section 329(4) BNS; corresponding Section 448 IPC; pending civil suit; investigation said to usurp jurisdiction of Civil Court; documents furnished to Investigating Agency; petition not pressed / disposed; liberty to file petition afresh on filing of charge-sheet; CRL.M.C. 1175/2026; CRL.M.A. 4699/2026; Delhi High Court; Justice Manoj Jain; order dated 11.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to file the petition afresh if a charge-sheet is filed in the matter; pending application likewise disposed of ¶20

Sandeep Yadav Vs the State of Delhi and Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~54

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 1175/2026 & CRL.M.A. 4699/2026

¶4

SANDEEP YADAV .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Arpit Bhalla, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Ghanshyam, PS S.B. Dairy.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶10

O R D E R % 11.02.2026

¶11

Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.24/2026 dated 13.01.2026, registered at P.S. Shahbad Dairy, for commission of offence under Section 329(4) of BNS (corresponding Section 448 IPC)

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a civil suit is already pending adjudication and despite the fact that the documents pertaining to such civil suit were made available to the Investigating Agency, they are going ahead with the investigation and trying to usurp the jurisdiction of Civil Court.

¶13

Learned Addl. P.P. for the State appears on advance notice and submits that investigation is underway and all the documents would be appropriately considered and the investigation would be just and fair.

¶14

In view of the above, at this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. He, however, submits that, in case

¶15

CRL.M.C. 1175/2026

¶16

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 10:27:26

¶19

charge-sheet is filed in the abovesaid matter, he may be granted liberty to file the petition afresh.

¶20

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶21

Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶22

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶23

FEBRUARY 11, 2026 st/js

¶24

CRL.M.C. 1175/2026

¶25

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 10:27:26

Sandeep Yadav v. the State of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Yadav v. the State of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabha Shankar Singh Vs Sumit Garg

Jitender Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Kusum Roadways Vs Hemkund Fill and Drive

Rajesh Gupta Vs the State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Sh. Vivek Shokeen Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mohd Jameel Vs the State of NCT of Delhi