Petitioners sought to withdraw their criminal writ petition before the Delhi High Court. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn along with pending applications, if any.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~53
SMT. SATTO DEVI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Counsel (appearance not given)
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 21.01.2026
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits, that the petitioners wish to withdraw the present petition. The petitioners are also present in court.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
JANUARY 21, 2026/ V.Rawat
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 12:35:56
Smt. Satto Devi and Ors
State NCT of Delhi and Ors
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
