Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR. After hearing arguments the Court was not inclined to quash, and counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~85
MOHD IRFAN @SONU & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Shehzad Ali, Adv.
versus
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with ASI Vikram Singh.
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R % 09.02.2026
CRL.M.A. 4366/2026 (exemption)
CRL.M.C. 1098/2026
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 09, 2026/A/R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/02/2026 at 10:29:55
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR should be quashed in light of the allegations made therein.
Mohd Irfan @Sonu & Ors.
The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
