Dismissed
Sri Chand v. CBI
Delhi HCCRL.A./1025/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an appeal abated on the death of the appellant and unwillingness of legal representatives to pursue the matter.
What did the court decide?
No relief; Appeal disposed of as abated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~25
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.A. 1025/2014, CRL.M.A. 15628/2015 & CRL.M.A. 15629/2015 SRI CHAND .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aditya Mishra, Adv.
¶4
versus
¶5
CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Kr. Rana, Proxy Counsel for Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, SPPCBI.
¶6
CORAM:
¶7
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV O R D E R
¶8
- % 12.05.2026
¶9
- Hybrid Mode.
¶10
- Learned counsel for the Appellant has placed on record copy of the death certificate of the Appellant along with order dated 24.11.2025 in CRL. 19/2018 and order dated 05.01.2026 in CRL.A 58/2016, vide which the proceeding were abated on account of death of the Appellant, who incidentally happens to be Appellant herein also.
¶11
- Proxy counsel for CBI on behalf of his senior counsel Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj mentioned that this fact has been verified and reported on behalf of the CBI in a case where Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj is the counsel in CRL.P 290/2024 CBI vs Sri Chand.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sri Chand
- respondent
CBI
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Kumar Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court