Allowed

Kamruddin @ Kamru v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Delhi HC15 Apr 2026W.P.(CRL)/1011/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Convict sought quashing of an order denying him a second spell of furlough on the ground of a required gap between parole and furlough. With his wife's surgery verified by the State and no objection from it, the court granted furlough with a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on second spell of furlough upon furnishing personal bond of Rs.10,000 before Jail Superintendent; surrender date to be given in writing against acknowledgement.

Kamruddin @ Kamru Vs State (Nct of Delhi) — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision: 15.04.2026

¶4

- W.P.(CRL) 1011/2026

¶5

KAMRUDDIN @ KAMRU .....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Siddarth Yadav and Mr. Anmol Kumar, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent

¶9

Through: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate for State with SI Shilpi.

¶10

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶11

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

¶12

Petitioner seeks quashing of order no. F10(003519035)/CJ/LEGAL/ PHQ/2026/M-958 dated 23.03.2026 in case FIR No. 248/2010 of PS Dhaula Kuan for offence under Section 365/376(2)(g)/506/34 IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel on behalf of ASC has appeared with instructions that the impugned order rejecting the application of the petitioner for second spell of furlough was for the reason that there should be one month gap

¶14

W.P.(CRL) 1011/2026

¶15

Page 1 of 3 pages GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT 3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.15 05:00:41 -07'00'

¶16

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT 3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.15 05:00:41 -07'00'

¶17

Signature Not Verified

¶18

Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Da te:1 5.04.2026 17:28:03

¶19

between parole and last furlough. It is further submitted by learned counsel that in special circumstances Rule 1212 of Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 can be relaxed. It is also submitted by learned counsel that since earlier medical record of wife of the petitioner was not available, those special circumstances were not taken into consideration. That being so, there is no serious objection to this petition from State.

¶20

Basically, after enjoying first spell of furlough, the petitioner surrendered on 20.03.2026, but before that he filed another petition [W.P.(CRL) 847/2026] for second spell on the ground that his wife had to be operated upon on 25.03.2026. The said petition was transmitted to the jail authorities to be treated as a representation. Accordingly, the impugned order was passed.

¶21

It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that now surgery of wife of petitioner has been scheduled for 20.04.2026 and this fact has been verified by the State.

¶22

Considering the above circumstances, this petition is allowed with consent and shall not be treated as a judicial precedent. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on second spell of furlough subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- before the concerned Jail Superintendent, to whom copy of this order be sent.

¶23

6. It is directed that, at the time of releasing the petitioner on furlough,

¶24

W.P.(CRL) 1011/2026

¶25

Page 2 of 3 pages

¶26

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.15 05:00:29 -07'00'

¶27

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Da te:1 5.04.2026 17:28:03

¶28

the concerned Jail Superintendent shall furnish to him in writing, against acknowledgement, the specific date on which the petitioner has to surrender.

¶29

Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec GIRISH 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 KATHPALIA 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.15 05:00:16 -07'00'

¶30

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE)

¶31

APRIL 15, 2026/ ry

¶32

W.P.(CRL) 1011/2026

¶33

Page 3 of 3 pages

¶34

Signature Not Verified

¶35

Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Da te:1 5.04.2026 17:28:03

Kamruddin @ Kamru v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamruddin @ Kamru v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kabir Gupta & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Bhupender Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Anju @Sonia @ Baby Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Naresh Kumar Vs State Gnctd and Ors.

Kamaljeet Singh Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Harvinder Vs the Government of NCT of Delhi

Mohammad Sagir Vs Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Sachin @ Kapil Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Anju @Sonia @ Baby Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Prakash Pal and Ors. Vs State of Gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Rishabh Gehlot Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Abhishek Anand Vs Union of India through Its Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

Komal Verma Vs State NCT of Delhi

Amit Pateriya Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi