Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order halting construction. Respondents stated no construction was ongoing after inspections and counsel for respondents 4-6 undertook to comply with the earlier order. The court recorded the undertaking and disposed of the contempt petition and pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
AFSHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sriavstava, Advocate.
versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 15.01.2026
Page 1 of 2
CONT.CAS(C) 71/2026
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 11:58:01
going on in the said property.
5.1. The statement of the counsel is taken on record and respondents no.4 to 6 shall be bound by the same.
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 15, 2026
at
Page 2 of 2
CONT.CAS(C) 71/2026
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/01/2026 at 11:58:01
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was wilful disobedience of the Court's 23.12.2024 order directing the SHO to stop construction at the property?
Afsha
Station House Officer
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
