Dr Rajinder Kumar Trisal Vs Dr Reshmi Singh & Anr.

¶1

$~18 *	to 23 IN THE HIGH COURT	OF	DELHI	AT	NEW DELHI
+	CONT.CAS(C) 590/2024
(18)	DR RAJINDER KUMAR TRI	SAL			.....Petitioner
	Through: versus DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.	None	.	..	...Respondent
	Through:	Mr.	Rushab	Aggarw	al (SC) along
		with Japni	Mrs. Ri sh Singh	ddhima Bhalla,	Aggarwal, Mr. Advs.
+	CONT.CAS(C) 591/2024
(19)	DR RAVI RAMAN DHAR				.....Petitioner
	Through: versus DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.	None	.	.	....Respondent
	Through:	Mr. with Japni	Rushab Mrs. Ri sh Singh	Aggarw ddhima Bhalla,	al (SC) along Aggarwal, Mr. Advs.
+	CONT.CAS(C) 592/2024
(20)	DR CHAMAN LAL DULLOO				.....Petitioner
	Through: versus	None	.
	DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.			..	...Respondent
	Through:	Mr. with Japni	Rushab Mrs. Ri sh Singh	Aggarw ddhima Bhalla,	al (SC) along Aggarwal, Mr. Advs.
+	CONT.CAS(C) 593/2024
(21)	DR BHARAT BHUSHAN KA	CHRO	O		.....Petitioner
	Through: versus	None	.
	DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR.			..	...Respondent
	Through:	Mr.	Rushab	Aggarw	al (SC) along
		with Japni	Mrs. Ri sh Singh	ddhima Bhalla,	Aggarwal, Mr. Advs.
+	CONT.CAS(C) 594/2024
(22)	DR UPENDER KRISHEN WA	LI			.....Petitioner
	Through: versus	None	.

¶2

This is a digitally signed order.

¶3

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:17:07

¶4

DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rushab Aggarwal (SC) along with Mrs. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr. Japnish Singh Bhalla, Advs.

¶5

- CONT.CAS(C) 595/2024 (23) DR VIJAY KUMAR KACHROO .....Petitioner Through: None.

¶6

versus

¶7

DR RESHMI SINGH & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rushab Aggarwal (SC) along with Mrs. Riddhima Aggarwal, Mr. Japnish Singh Bhalla, Advs.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 17.02.2026

¶10

None appears for the petitioners.

¶11

The present petitions allege wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the judgment dated 08.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 7917/2019. The operative direction contained therein reads as under:-

¶12

“16. In view of the aforesaid findings, the impugned orders granting second and third time-bound promotions to the Petitioner from 16.03.2017 instead of 01.04.1995 and 01.04.2000 respectively, are required to be modified to a limited extent by deleting the words ‘notional’ and ‘monetary’ and holding that the Petitioner shall be entitled to all monetary effects ensuing from the two time-bound promotions from the respective dates from which the promotions have been actually granted. It is further directed that Respondents shall refix the salary and emoluments of the Petitioner, if required, and calculate the arrears due from the dates of second and third time bound promotions and disburse the arrears within three months from today. Failure to release the arrears within the time granted by the Court will entail granting simple interest @ 9% p.a. from the dates the amount fell due till actual payment. These directions are being passed in respect of all Petitioners in the aforementioned six petitions.”

¶13

It transpires during the course of hearing that an LPA came to be

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:17:07

¶16

filed against the aforesaid judgment being LPA Nos. 872/2024, 876/2024, 877/2024, 879/2024, 882/2024, 883/2024, which has been dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 10.10.2025. The operative portion thereof reads as under:-

¶17

In the circumstances, it is incumbent on the respondents to act in terms of the aforesaid judgment dated 08.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 7917/2019 and comply with the directions contained therein. Let the same be done expeditiously

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that an exercise is ongoing to ascertain the financial impact of the judgment. He assures and undertakes that requisite steps shall be taken expeditiously to adhere/ comply with the orders passed by this Court. He submits that the Department is also in the process of taking legal opinion to consider whether

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:17:07

¶20

it would be advisable to file an SLP in the Supreme Court.

¶21

In the circumstances, it is directed that unless compliance is obviated on account of any interim orders passed by the Supreme Court, the respondents shall comply with the concerned directions therein within a period of eight weeks from today.

¶22

The petitions are disposed of in the above terms.

¶23

In the event of non-compliance, the petitioners shall be at liberty to revive the present proceedings.

¶24

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶25

FEBRUARY 17, 2026/uk

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:17:07

Dr Rajinder Kumar Trisal v. Dr Reshmi Singh & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr Rajinder Kumar Trisal v. Dr Reshmi Singh & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neha Mahindru Vs Vishaw Sethi

Dikshant Joshi Vs Station House Officer & Anr.

Munzareen Ahmad Vs Dttdc Ltd.

Munzareen Ahmad Vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd.

Rita Rikh Vs Arvind Kumar Gautam

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Alok Tripathi and Anr.

Bajarangi Vs Shri Sanjeev Khirwar and Ors.

Shri Balbir Singh Mann Vs Government of NCT of Delhi through Its Secretary Sh Rajeev Verma

Madhuban Vs M/S Ganesh Industries

Dayaram Gaur Vs M/S Ganesh Industries

Neha Mahindru Vs Vishaw Sethi

Harender & Ors. Vs Union of India & Anr.

M/S Disha Voice and Surveillance Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sh. Nirvesh Kumar and Anr.

Sanjay Panwar Vs Sanjeev Khirwar and Ors.