Disposed¶20

Anshu v. SHO Ps Hari Nagar and Anr.

Delhi HC13 Mar 2026CONT.CAS(C)/399/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, CONT.CAS(C) 399/2026, Anshu v. SHO PS Hari Nagar & Anr., decided 13.03.2026 by Justice Sachin Datta. Contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of JMFC West, Tis Hazari Court order dated 16.05.2025 in Ct. Case 822/2025 disposed of without being entertained; respondents stated CCTV footage preserved and SHO, PS Hari Nagar filing reply in ongoing proceedings; further orders left to the concerned court. No statutes cited; no precedents cited or engaged with; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

It shall be for the concerned court (JMFC West, Tis Hazari Court) to pass appropriate and further orders in the matter, as may be deemed appropriate. ¶19

Anshu Vs SHO Ps Hari Nagar and Anr. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~110

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 399/2026 ANSHU .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Petitioner in person (through v/c)

¶5

versus

¶6

SHO PS HARI NAGAR AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh, CGSC, Mr. Ankit Khatri and SI Tej Dutt, PS Hari Nagar.

¶7

Mr. Kushagra Kumar, SPC, UOI.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 13.03.2026

¶10

CM APPL.15677/2026 (Exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

CONT.CAS(C) 399/2026 & CM APPL.15676/2026 (for directions)

¶14

The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the order dated 16.05.2025 passed by JMFC West, Tis Hazari Court in Ct. Case 822/2025.

¶15

The same reads as under:

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:09:46

¶18

During the course of hearing, it is stated by learned counsel for the respondents that the concerned CCTV footage has been preserved. It is further submitted that the respondent / SHO, PS Hari Nagar is in the process of filing a reply in the aforesaid ongoing proceedings.

¶19

Needless to say, it shall be for the concerned court to pass appropriate and further orders in the matter, as may be deemed appropriate. 6. Considering the circumstances, this Court does not consider it appropriate to entertain the present petition, especially in view of the aforesaid statement on behalf of the respondent.

¶20

The same is accordingly, disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶21

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶22

MARCH 13, 2026/ cl

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:09:46

Anshu v. SHO Ps Hari Nagar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshu v. SHO Ps Hari Nagar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kailash Kumari Tuteja Vs Harsh Kumar Tuteja and Anr.

Atma Ram Dogra & Ors. Vs UOI & Ors.

Wushu Association of India (Wai) Vs Mr Vipin Kumar Saini & Ors.

Kleenoil Filtration India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Udit Khatri & Anr.

Sunil Pokhriyal Vs Vijay Yadav & Anr.

Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs R a Sankra Narayan

Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Muntazmia Comittee Madasra Behrul Ulum Kabarstan Mehrauli Vs Shri Subhasish Panda and Ors.

Smt. Kailash Kumari Tuteja Vs Harsh Kumar Tuteja and Anr.

Wushu Association of India (Wai) Vs Mr Vipin Kumar Saini & Ors.

Kleenoil Filtration India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Udit Khatri & Anr.

Anuj Malhotra Vs State

Shri Raj Bir Singh Nagar Vs Food Corporation of India

M/S. Triune Projects Private Limited Vs Mr Nikhil Kumar Commissioner of State GST and Vat, Department of Trade and Taxes, Delhi