Disposed¶16

Savitri v. Sanjeev Khirwar & Ors. & Ors.

Delhi HC13 Mar 2026CONT.CAS(C)/396/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Savitri v. Sanjeev Khirwar & Ors., CONT.CAS(C) 396/2026, Delhi High Court, 13.03.2026, Sachin Datta, J. - contempt petition alleging disobedience of directions dated 10.10.2023 in W.P.12821/2023 requiring MCD to allow street vending per Certificates of Vending (City SP Zone, Ward-84N); MCD states no impediment posed; petition disposed of without further orders.

What did the court decide?

On the respondent MCD's statement (taken on record) that no impediment had been posed to the petitioner's vending activities, the Court found no further orders necessary and disposed of the contempt petition. ¶16

Savitri Vs Sanjeev Khirwar & Ors. & Ors. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~102

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CONT.CAS(C) 396/2026 SAVITRI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Tripathy and Mr. Prashant, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

SANJEEV KHIRWAR & ORS. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, ASC and Mr. Yash Agarwal, Adv., MCD.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 13.03.2026

¶8

The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the judgment / order dated 10.10.2023, passed in W.P.12821/2023. The operative directions therein are as under:

¶9

“ 8. In view of the foregoing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, limits the relief in the present writ petition, to a direction to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, to permit the above-mentioned street vendors, to continue to vend within City SP Zone, Ward-84N,strictly and scrupulously in compliance with the terms and conditions of the said Certificates of Vending.”

¶10

9. In view of the above, the present writ petition is partly allowed; and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is directed to permit the abovementioned street vendors, to vend within their respective zones, subject to the te1ms and conditions as specified in their Certificates of Vending, without any let or hindrance. ”

¶11

The petitioner contends that despite the aforesaid directions, the respondents are preventing the petitioner from continuing with her vending activities.

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:09:41

¶14

Learned counsel for the respondent / Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), who appears on advance notice, submits that no impediment have been posed by the respondent to the vending activities of the petitioner.

¶15

The said statement is taken on record.

¶16

In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition; the same is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶17

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶18

MARCH 13, 2026/ cl

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/03/2026 at 17:09:41

Savitri v. Sanjeev Khirwar & Ors. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Savitri v. Sanjeev Khirwar & Ors. & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kailash Kumari Tuteja Vs Harsh Kumar Tuteja and Anr.

Atma Ram Dogra & Ors. Vs UOI & Ors.

Wushu Association of India (Wai) Vs Mr Vipin Kumar Saini & Ors.

Kleenoil Filtration India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Udit Khatri & Anr.

Sunil Pokhriyal Vs Vijay Yadav & Anr.

Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs R a Sankra Narayan

Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Muntazmia Comittee Madasra Behrul Ulum Kabarstan Mehrauli Vs Shri Subhasish Panda and Ors.

Smt. Kailash Kumari Tuteja Vs Harsh Kumar Tuteja and Anr.

Wushu Association of India (Wai) Vs Mr Vipin Kumar Saini & Ors.

Kleenoil Filtration India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Udit Khatri & Anr.

Anuj Malhotra Vs State

Shri Raj Bir Singh Nagar Vs Food Corporation of India

M/S. Triune Projects Private Limited Vs Mr Nikhil Kumar Commissioner of State GST and Vat, Department of Trade and Taxes, Delhi