This court closed contempt proceedings alleging disobedience of a prior order. After the respondent filed a status report stating no unauthorized construction was ongoing and counsels were agreed with this finding, the court closed the present proceedings without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
SURINDER JAIN AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Arun Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Advocates.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH COMMISSIONER AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, Standing counsel of MCD with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate for R-1/MCD. Mr. Abhinav Singh and Ms. Prapti Jain, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel with Mr. Chaitanya Kumar, Advocate for R-5 & 6/Delhi Police.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 27.04.2026
Page 1 of 2
CONT.CAS(C) 1598/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 12:09:46
order dated 22nd December, 2025 before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD (ATMCD). In the said appeal, a direction has been passed on 19th January, 2026, stating that no further construction shall be raised in the subject property. The operative part of the order is set out below:
AMIT BANSAL, J
APRIL 27, 2026 Rzu
Page 2 of 2
CONT.CAS(C) 1598/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/04/2026 at 12:09:46
Surinder Jain
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
