Kirloskar Proprietary Limited Vs Narendra Jain Proprietor of Agrawal Trading Company — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Kirloskar Proprietary Limited Vs Narendra Jain Proprietor of Agrawal Trading Company — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Both petitions (C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 273/2025 & I.A. 30986/2025 and C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 274/2025 & I.A. 30989/2025) disposed of in terms of prayer (a): remove/cancel the entry pertaining to the Impugned Registration of trademark registered under no.5035413 in Class 6 from the Register of Trademarks, with exemplary costs in favour of the Petitioner/KPL and against Respondent No.1; parties directed to cooperate for smooth implementation.

Issue for consideration

Whether the entry pertaining to the Impugned Registration of trademark registered under no.5035413 in Class 6 should be removed/cancelled from the Register of Trademarks, with exemplary costs in favour of the Petitioner and against Respondent No.1 (prayer (a)).

Court's answer

In view of respondent no.1 having no objection, the petitions are disposed of in terms of prayer (a), i.e., removal/cancellation of the entry pertaining to the Impugned Registration of trademark registered under no.5035413 in Class 6 from the Register of Trademarks.

Ratio / Principle

The parties are directed to cooperate to ensure the smooth implementation of the present order.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela), by order dated 19.03.2026, disposed of two companion commercial-IPD/trademark petitions - C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 273/2025 & I.A. 30986/2025 and C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 274/2025 & I.A. 30989/2025 - filed by Kirloskar Proprietary Limited ('KPL') against Narendra Jain, proprietor of Agrawal Trading Company (Respondent No.1), and other respondents. Counsel for Respondent No.1, on instructions, submitted that they had no objection to the petitioner's prayer (a), which sought removal/cancellation of the entry pertaining to the Impugned Registration of trademark registered under no.5035413 in Class 6 from the Register of Trademarks, with exemplary costs in favour of KPL and against Respondent No.1. In view of that submission, the Court disposed of the petitions in terms of prayer (a) and directed the parties to cooperate to ensure smooth implementation of the order. No statute or precedent was cited in the order.

$~10 & 11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

(10) + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 273/2025 & I.A. 30986/2025

KIRLOSKAR PROPRIETARY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Tushar Ajinkya, Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Mr. Ankit Acharya, Ms. Sukanya Sehgal, Ms. Misha Matlani, Ms. Ritu Chaudhary, Mr. Ayush Jain, Mr. Rohan Phadke and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates.

versus

NARENDRA JAIN PROPRIETOR OF AGRAWAL TRADING COMPANY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kartik Malhotra and Ms. Shreya Mansi James, Advocates for R-1 alongwith R-1 in person. Mr. Gaurav Barathi, SPC alongwith Mr. Mrityunjay Mahendra, G.P. for R-2, 3 & 4.

(11)

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 274/2025 & I.A. 30989/2025 KIRLOSKAR PROPRIETARY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Tushar Ajinkya, Ms. Pratiksha Sharma, Mr. Ankit Acharya, Ms. Sukanya Sehgal, Ms. Misha Matlani, Ms. Ritu Chaudhary, Mr. Ayush Jain, Mr. Rohan Phadke and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates.

versus

NARENDRA JAIN PROPRIETOR OF AGRAWAL TRADING COMPANY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kartik Malhotra and Ms. Shreya Mansi James, Advocates for R-1

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/03/2026 at 12:25:51

alongwith R-1 in person. Mr. Gaurav Barathi, SPC alongwith Mr. Mrityunjay Mahendra, G.P. for R-2, 3 & 4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

O R D E R % 19.03.2026

Mr. Kartik Malhotra, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1, on instructions, submits that they have no objection in case the prayer of the petitioner is allowed in terms of prayer (a) extracted hereunder:

“a. Remove/cancel the entry pertaining to Impugned Registration of trademark

registered under no.5035413 in Class 6, from the Register of Trademarks with exemplary costs in favour of the Petitioner/KPL and against Respondent No.1.”

In view of the above, the petitions are disposed of in terms of prayer (a). The parties are directed to cooperate to ensure the smooth implementation of the present order.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

MARCH 19, 2026 kct

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/03/2026 at 12:25:51