Challenge to an arbitration award under the Commercial Courts Act; in view of a companion judgment setting aside an identical impugned award, the court found no further orders necessary and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**
% Judgment reserved on: 20.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on: 26.02.2026
TITAGARH RAIL SYSTEMS LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Priya Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms. Aanchal Mullick, Ms. Shubhi Agarwal, Mr. Manan Bansal and Mr. Daksh Arora, Advs.
versus
RAILWAYS BOARD, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shashank Garg, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Husain Taqvi, Ms. Nishtah Jain, Ms. Aradhya Chaturvedi and Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN J U D G M E N T
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.
FEBRUARY 26, 2026/Pa
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:HONEY O.M.P. (COMM) 503/2024 ARORA Signing Da te:2 6.02.2026 17:41:55
Titagarh Rail Systems Limited
Railways Board, Ministry of Railways, Government of India
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
