Dismissed¶20

Almac Laser Private Limited v. Trident Limited

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 34 – Setting-aside of Arbitral Award dated 24.09.2022

Delhi HC23 Mar 2026O.M.P. (COMM)/495/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Almac Laser Private Limited v. Trident Limited; O.M.P.(COMM) 495/2025; Delhi High Court; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar J.; order dated 23.03.2026; Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; setting aside Arbitral Award 24.09.2022; petition withdrawn; acceptance of award; execution proceedings Executing Court Vadodara; Rs. 9 Lakhs received of Rs. 12.5 Lakhs awarded; payment schedule under consideration; dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the present Petition granted; the Petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn. ¶20

Almac Laser Private Limited Vs Trident Limited — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (COMM) 495/2025, I.A. 28995/2025 (For Delay 111 days in filing the petition), I.A. 28996/2025 (Stay) & I.A. 28997/2025 (Delay of 925 days in refilling the petition)

¶4

ALMAC LASER PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Alok Sinha, Mr. Aakash Saini, Mr. Deepansh Saini and Mr. Pulkit Kapoor, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

TRIDENT LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Mittal, Mr. Abhijeet Varshney and Mrs. Shilpa G. Mittal, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 23.03.2026

¶12

The present petition, filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeks setting-aside of the Arbitral Award dated 24.09.2022 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are ad idem that the execution proceedings relating to the Award under challenge are pending before the Executing Court at Vadodara. It is submitted that the previous Order dated 12.03.2026 also records the said fact.

¶14

It is further submitted that the Order dated 12.03.2026 also records that a sum of approximately Rs. 9 Lakhs, out of the total awarded amount of approximately Rs. 12.5 Lakhs, has already been received by the Respondent, as also the fact that the Petitioner has, before the Executing Court at Vadodara, committed to satisfy the

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:32:54

¶17

entire awarded amount and has also filed a schedule outlining therein the time period within which the said amounts would be paid, which proposal is still under consideration by the Respondent.

¶18

Since it is obvious that the Petitioner herein has accepted the Award as he has taken positive steps towards the satisfaction of the same, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition.

¶19

Leave, as sought for, is granted.

¶20

In view of the above, the present Petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. MARCH 23, 2026/tk/va

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 12:32:54

Almac Laser Private Limited v. Trident Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Almac Laser Private Limited v. Trident Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh. Prakash Chand Goyal HUF Vs Mr. Sunil Walia and Anr.

Railtel Corporation of India Limited Vs Centre for Railway Information Systems

Proelium Learning Solutions Private Limited Vs Anand Sagar Public School

Bharti P Patel & Anr. Vs Harcharan Singh Ranauta & Anr.

Mr. Harcharan Singh Ranauta & Anr. Vs Mrs. Bharti P. Patel & Anr.

Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd. Vs Poonam Tripathi