Petition under O.M.P.(I)(Comm.) was settled between the parties; counsel for petitioners sought and obtained permission to withdraw, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
JATASYA PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar, Mr. Shashank Sharma & Mr. Raghav Luthra, Advs.
versus
IDBI TRUSTEESHIP SERVICES LTD THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Angad Varma, Mr. Nikhil Mehndiratta, Mr. Agastya Sen & Ms. Nidhisha Choksi, Advs. for R1 & 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
JANUARY 9, 2026 Ch
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/01/2026 at 12:45:41
JATASYA PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR & ORS.
IDBI TRUSTEESHIP SERVICES LTD THROUGH ITS ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT
ANR.
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
