Disposed¶17

Rambachan Panalal Sahani v. Hitachi India Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC6 Jan 2026O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/3/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 3/2026; Section 14(1) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996; termination of arbitrator's mandate upon settlement; Arbitration Petition 1887/2025; Hitachi India Pvt. Ltd.; settlement amount Rs. 34,00,000/-; Justice Mini Pushkarna; petition disposed of with pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the Sole Arbitrator terminated; petition disposed of along with pending applications I.A. 144/2026 and I.A. 145/2026. ¶17

Rambachan Panalal Sahani Vs Hitachi India Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~8

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 3/2026, I.A. 144/2026 & I.A. 145/2026

¶4

RAMBACHAN PANALAL SAHANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Kavya Jhawar and Ms. Helly Panchal, Advs. Mob: 8758670217 Email: [email protected]

¶5

versus

¶6

HITACHI INDIA PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rabiya Thakur, Adv.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶8

O R D E R % 06.01.2026

¶9

The present petition has been filed under Section 14(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”), seeking a declaration that the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator, appointed by this Court in Arbitration Petition 1887/2025 , vide order dated 11^th November, 2025, be terminated, in accordance with the provisions of law.

¶10

Learned counsels appearing for the parties jointly submit that the parties have amicably settled the disputes amongst themselves. It is further submitted that the parties have already indicated and communicated to the learned Arbitrator that the parties would be unable to continue with the arbitral proceedings in view of the said settlement.

¶11

It is submitted that respondent has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 34,00,000/- to the petitioner, towards settlement of all claims, which amount

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:10:35

¶14

already stands paid.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner confirms that her client has received the amount under the settlement, on 25^th December, 2025.

¶16

For the reasons stated above and in view of the joint submissions made by learned counsels appearing for the parties, the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator is hereby terminated.

¶17

The present petition, along with the pending applications, is accordingly disposed of.

¶18

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶19

JANUARY 6, 2026/ SK

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:10:35

Rambachan Panalal Sahani v. Hitachi India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambachan Panalal Sahani v. Hitachi India Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vipin Kumar Sharma Vs the Returning Officer Ndba Elections, 2025

M/S D Thakkar Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Container Corporation of India Ltd.

M/S Sijori International LLP through Its Partner Sailander Solanki Vs Yogesh Malik Proprietor B.S. Dwarka

M/S Kgk Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Highways Authority of India NHAI & Anr.

Kalpataru Projects International Limited Vs Northern Railway

M/S Super Disco Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Ravi and Singh Communication