Disposed¶14
Sh Amit Kumar v. Sh Rajiv Suri
Delhi HCCM(M)/92/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Withdrawal/infructuousity disposal of two Delhi High Court miscellaneous petitions - CM(M) 86/2026 (Amit Kumar v. Bal Kishan) and CM(M) 92/2026 (Sh. Amit Kumar v. Sh. Rajiv Suri) - by Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta on 10.04.2026; counsel Nishant Anand, Gunjan Bansal and Tarun Choudhary appeared for petitioners through VC; no statutes cited, no cases cited, no quantum. Of value only as a status/withdrawal record, not for citation of legal principle.
What did the court decide?
Both CM(M) petitions disposed of as withdrawn on counsel's submission that they had become infructuous; pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. ¶14