Petitioner sought permission to withdraw two petitions; the court disposed of the petitions as withdrawn along with pending applications.
Permission to withdraw the petitions granted; petitions and pending applications disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8 & 9
Through: Mr. Dilip Kumar, Advocate. versus
M/S GAUGE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING &ANR.
.....Respondents
versus
GAUGE ADVERTISING AND MARKETING &ANR.
.....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R % 13.04.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
APRIL 13, 2026/ MR/TP
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2026 at 12:18:49
M/S R.K. Inc
M/S Gauge Advertising and Marketing
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
