Petition filed with defects; counsel sought leave to withdraw with liberty to file afresh. Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
Withdrawal permitted with liberty to file a fresh petition; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
Through: Mr. Arjun Harkauli and Ms. Deeksha Gaur, Advocates.
versus
SATEJ KUMAR BAJAJ ALIAS KUMAR BAJAJ ALIAS SATEJ KUMAR .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
% 26.02.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
FEBRUARY 26, 2026/ v/tp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 11:53:29
Veena Singh
Satej Kumar Bajaj alias Kumar Bajaj alias Satej Kumar
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
