Petitioner company sought withdrawal of its petition before the Delhi High Court. The director's authorisation and board resolution were taken on record, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
CRESCITA GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, petitioner in person.
versus
KUDU KNIT PROCESS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Pruthi & Ms. Rachna, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 04.05.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
MAY 4, 2026/ab/tp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 11:54:07
Crescita Global Private Limited
Kudu Knit Process Private Limited
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
