High Court of Delhi entertained a winding up petition to quash an order in a maintenance case where a witness recall application was ignored. Petitioners requested withdrawal with liberty under law; counsel withdrew the petition.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty granted; remaining applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
CNR No. DLHC010413222026
ANITA RAI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Yash Mishra, Mr. Satyadev Prakash, Ms. Tanushree Karnawat, Ms. Mansi Rajpal and Ms. Anisha Shinha, Advocates.
versus
PARAMVIR SINGH RAI .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R % 02.09.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 11:15:08
Application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 02, 2026/tk/jk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2026 at 11:15:08
ANITA RAI & ORS.
PARAMVIR SINGH RAI
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
