Petitioners sought withdrawal of the petition after settling the underlying dispute with the respondents, with the related suit before the trial court already disposed of. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
MS. NITIKA KHANDURI & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Arun Mehra and Mr. Vikramjeet Singh, Advocates.
versus
SHRI KULDIP CHANDRA VIG & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Respondent No. 1 in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
% 29.04.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
APRIL 29, 2026/ MR/isk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:18:15
Ms. Nitika Khanduri & Ors.
Shri Kuldip Chandra Vig
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
