Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition as infructuous since the underlying suit had already been decided by the trial court. The High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, with pending applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
JUBILANT FOODWORKS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Mehandru, Ms. Charu Tandon, Mr. Raghav Tandon, Mr. Nikhil Kharaliya, Ms. Diksha Jaspal, Mr. Ashutosh Singh, Ms. Vidushi Singh, Advocates (through VC).
versus
SHAKEEL KHAN
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R
% 24.02.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
FEBRUARY 24, 2026/ v/tp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2026 at 12:09:55
JUBILANT FOODWORKS LIMITED
SHAKEEL KHAN
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
