Union of India sought leave to withdraw its petition against the MSME Facilitation Council after arguments; the Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
Through: Mr. Vinay Yadav, CGSC with Ms. Kamna Behrani and Ms. Rashika Gupta, SPAC.
versus
MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL, DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
O R D E R % 14.05.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
MAY 14, 2026/ MR/TP
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 11:31:16
Union of India
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council, Delhi
Anr.
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
