Sonu Goyala v. Meenu
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition under Article 227 sought expeditious disposal of a guardianship petition and interim visitation application before the Family Court. Counsel sought leave to withdraw; leave granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move the Family Court.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to withdraw granted; petitioner may move the Family Court for appropriate relief.
What the court decided
$~62
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 1122/2026
- SONU GOYALA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rohit Shukla, Mr. Vivek Kumar Gaurav & Mr. Harsh Chaudhary, Advs. versus MEENU .....Respondent Through: Mr. Desh Raj, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
- % 14.05.2026
- This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL. 32490/2026 (Exemption)
- Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.
CM(M) 1122/2026
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should the High Court direct expeditious adjudication of a guardianship petition and visitation application pending before the Family Court, Tis Hazari?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sonu Goyala
- respondent
Meenu
Coram
Amit Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court