Sachin Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular bail application in a POCSO and IPC FIR was not pressed; counsel sought leave to withdraw, and the Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Regular bail application in a POCSO and IPC FIR was not pressed; counsel sought leave to withdraw, and the Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
SACHIN KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kishor Kumar Mishra, Adv.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Ramesh Kumar.
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
O R D E R % 20.02.2026
CRL.M.A. 5813/2026 (exemption)
BAIL APPLN. 755/2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 12:12:49
DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 20, 2026/A/AP
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 12:12:49
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sachin Kumar
State of NCT of Delhi
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court