Disposed

Salim v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC18 Feb 2026BAIL APPLN./713/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in a POCSO and IPC sexual offence case was not pressed by counsel after arguments, who sought liberty to file afresh. The Court disposed of the application as not pressed, granted liberty, and directed the trial court to conclude the trial expeditiously since material witnesses had been examined.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to file fresh application; trial court directed to expedite proceedings.

Salim Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~53

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 713/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5548/2026

¶4

SALIM .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Paritosh Singh Rajput with Mr. Mohd. Yusuf and Mr. Rajeev Upadhyay, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Tulsi (P.S. Welcome)

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶10

O R D E R % 18.02.2026

¶11

Applicant seeks Regular Bail in FIR No.491/2023 dated 06.06.2023 registered at P.S. Welcome for offences under Section 323/376D/377/506, IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children From Sexual Offence (POCSO) Act, 2012 .

¶12

The prime most reason given by the applicant is to the effect that evidence of the prosecutrix is completely shaky and wavering and, in her initial-most deposition, she did not come up with any allegation with respect to commission of rape upon her. It is also apprised that all the material public witnesses have already been examined.

¶13

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present bail application. He, however, submits that he may be granted liberty to file the

¶14

BAIL APPLN. 713/2026

¶15

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:09:13

¶18

application afresh at a later stage.

¶19

The application is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed.

¶20

Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶21

Liberty, as prayed, is granted.

¶22

Simultaneously, since the material public witnesses, including the prosecutrix, have already been examined, the learned Trial Court shall make best endeavour to dispose of the matter, as expeditiously as possible.

¶23

Learned Addl. P.P. for the State states that he would convey the message to his counterpart before the learned District Court to ensure that the remaining witnesses are summoned and examined as expeditiously as possible and assures that there would not be any delay or inaction on their part.

¶24

A copy of this order be sent to learned Trial Court for information and due compliance.

¶25

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶26

FEBRUARY 18, 2026 st/pb

¶27

BAIL APPLN. 713/2026

¶28

¶29

This is a digitally signed order.

¶30

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:09:13

Salim v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salim v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Simranjeet Singh Vs State NCT of Delhi

Mohammad Yusuf Khan Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Kailash Pathray and Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Arun Anand Vs State NCT of Delhi

Shivam Chopra & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Badal Vs State NCT of Delhi