Bail application withdrawn by counsel after the applicant's arrest in another FIR; the High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn without reaching any decision on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
PRANAV ARYA .....Applicant
Through: Mr. Himanshu Yadav, Advocate (Through VC)
versus
THE STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 17.04.2026
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
APRIL 17, 2026/NA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 11:36:37
Pranav Arya
The State of NCT Delhi
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
