Regular bail application: after some arguments, counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw, and the High Court dismissed the bail application, along with the pending application, as withdrawn, expressly recording that no observations were made on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
VINAY @ KAKKU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Surendra Yadav, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Sumit, PS-Aman Vihar.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 06.02.2026
After some arguments, Mr. Surendra Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this bail application.
The bail application, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn.
It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the matter.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 6, 2026 ‘Bhupi/KA’/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 11:53:56
Vinay @ Kakku
The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
