Sunder Menghraj Chainani v. State (Nct of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: modification of appearance; wrongly recorded instructing counsels; Section 528 BNSS 2023 application by complainant; Victim counsel panel; Vikas Pahwa Sr. Adv.; Abhimanyu Bhandari Sr. Adv.; Nalin Kohli Sr. Adv.; Maanish M. Choudhary; Bharat Chugh; Jai Allagh; judgment dated 24.02.2026; CRL.M.A. 6856/2026; BAIL APPLN. 5002/2025; Sunder Menghraj Chainani; State (NCT of Delhi); Delhi High Court; Justice Vikas Mahajan; application disposed. Context: administrative correction order disposing of a complainant's request to rectify the recorded appearance in the earlier judgment of 24.02.2026; no substantive holding, no statutory interpretation beyond the filing provision, no precedents engaged.
What did the court decide?
Appearance on behalf of the complainant in judgment dated 24.02.2026 modified to read: “Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv., Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Nalin Kohli, Sr. Adv. with Major Nirvirkar Singh (Retd.), Mr. Bharat Chugh, Mr. Maanish M. Choudhary, Mr. Jai Allagh, Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, Mr. Shivam, Mr. Anurag, Advs. for Victim.”