Mr. Pradeep Solanki Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Broadly speaking, according to prosecution case, the accused/applicant and his associates killed the deceased by way of multiple gunshot injuries. The first informant, Suraj Bhan who witnessed the alleged

¶16

BAIL APPLN. 4926/2025

¶17

Page 1 of 3 pages

¶18

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.16 17:24:08 -07'00'

¶19

Signature Not Verified

¶20

Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Da te:1 6.03.2026 17:38:28

¶21

killing was also fired at but the shot misfired and did not hit him. Out of three eye witnesses, the first informant Suraj Bhan was killed later and was dropped vide order dated 01.07.2024 while the other eye witnesses Sanjay Malik and Bheem Singh have not supported prosecution case.

¶22

Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that he is in custody for past almost ten years and no public witness remains to be examined in this case, therefore, the accused/applicant deserves to be admitted to bail. As regards the case under MCOCA, it is contended by learned counsel that in the said case, bail has not been granted till date. Regarding the remaining cases, it is contended that in some of the cases the accused/applicant stands acquitted while in other cases trials are pending and he is on bail. It is also contended that the co-accused Dharmender has already been granted bail.

¶23

Learned APP opposes the bail application in view of antecedents of the accused/applicant. However, learned APP on instructions of the IO fairly admits that there is no evidence in the present case which can lead to conviction of the accused/applicant because the eye witnesses have not supported prosecution and nothing incriminating was recovered from the accused/applicant. It is also admitted by learned APP that all public witnesses already stand examined.

¶24

Keeping in mind the aforesaid circumstances in the light of long incarceration of the accused/applicant, the application is allowed and accused/applicant is admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the

¶25

BAIL APPLN. 4926/2025

¶26

Page 2 of 3 pages

¶27

GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.16 17:23:45 -07'00'

¶28

Signature Not Verified

¶29

Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Da te:1 6.03.2026 17:38:28

¶30

satisfaction of the Trial Court.

¶31

Nothing discussed in this order shall prejudice either side at the stage of final arguments before the trial court.

¶32

A copy of this order be immediately transmitted to the concerned Jail Superintendent for informing the accused/applicant.

¶33

Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 GIRISH 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 KATHPALIA 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.16 17:23:30 -07'00'

¶34

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE)

¶35

MARCH 16, 2026/ dr

¶36

BAIL APPLN. 4926/2025

¶37

Page 3 of 3 pages

¶38

Signature Not Verified

¶39

Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Da te:1 6.03.2026 17:38:28

Mr. Pradeep Solanki v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Pradeep Solanki v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hardayal Singh Vs Gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Bano Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Mustafa Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Mitali Gulhati Vs State NCT of Delhi

Nishant Chaudhary Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Manju Aggarwal Vs State (Nct of Delhi)